After having some of the categories up for a while now, it seems there is a difference in how the “Governance” category is interpreted and used:
- Internal Orcanaut governance discussions
- Governance thought sharing/ research
- Discord summaries
There is no right or wrong way of using the category, but I think it might be useful to separate those use cases out for clarity.
What might help is to rename “Governance” to “Research”; would capture a wider set of topics while removing the signal that it’s for internal governance. And rename “Temp Check” to “Governance/ Temp Check” to nudge internal governance discussions into the Temp Check category.
Tagging @aia because I think you were the original person to suggest having a Governance category.